Displacement

 

Some birds seem to have their own version of a child’s game, king of the castle. I have watched gulls and geese (the latter only during the mating season) play a game which involves approaching a perched advisory from behind to displace it. (There are other species that seem happy to share a perch.) 

A few days ago, I noticed an interspecies version of the game.

A Belted Kingfisher was watching for fish from atop a piling.

Abruptly, it dived over the side.
  

It was quickly evident that the kingfisher’s departure was a result of a Northern Flicker approaching from behind. Here the ascending flicker is seen on the left while the displaced kingfisher is partly hidden by the piling.

Posted in birds | 1 Comment

Bonnet

 

“I am told that it is appropriate to wear a special bonnet today.”

Posted in birds | 2 Comments

Guttation

 

Guttation is NOT dew. Dew (condensation from vapour) would give no hint that the growing season had begun; guttation does.

I have often marked the beginning of spring with a picture of guttation—to me the best indication that plants have begun to metabolize. It is a sign that the plant—in this case grass—is pumping xylem fluid from the roots to the leaves. During the day, such fluid is transpired. However, on a cold night, the stomata have closed and the fluid is extruded through the tip of the blade (at a hydathode) to give guttation. 

On earlier occasions, I would often lie on the grass and take a macro image of the guttation drops, each hanging from the tip of the grass blade. On this occasion, the striking nature of this backlit image was more compelling. 

Guttation: spring is underway.

Posted in weather | 1 Comment

Goose for breakfast

 

From the moment I spotted the fresh carcass of a Canada Goose on the shore, I knew it would be worth watching. Now, what might take an interest in this?

The first visitor was a three-and-a-half year old eagle (note, the dark flecking on its crown).

This was followed by a succession of ravens,

And a dog that was only dissuaded from stealing the prize by its (human) pack leader.

The most photogenic scavenger was an adult Bald Eagle: “Love the giblets; Hate the feathers.”

Interestingly, this eagle was driven off by the persistent harassment of other geese. Were they merely mobbing a predator, or were they objecting to the desecration of a colleague?

Following this, a one-and-a-half year old eagle landed and tried to reach the carcass. It, too, was harassed by other geese that loudly blocked its path.

My favourite shot was of the adult bald having breakfast at sunrise.

Posted in birds | 6 Comments

Sunken barge

 

April is upon us and the Lake, while still low, is rising. I had hoped to obtain overhead pictures of a sunken barge earlier, but lowest water and a calm surface did not coincide, so I failed to get the best view. Maybe I can do better next year. For now, both the Lake level and its turbidity are rising as a result of the added inflow from snowmelt in the mountains.

The barge has long been known to the Underwater Archaeological Society of British Columbia and to local divers. Indeed, Rob Wyatt has posted a video about diving to it. However, I was unaware of the barge until I accidentally spotted it while exploring flicker cavities at the adjacent floating drydock at Sunshine Bay on the West Arm.

Before the railway was completed along the shore in 1901, barges were used to move freight cars down the Lake. However, those barges were over 200 feet (61 metres) long. This barge is much smaller. Bill Meekel tells me that:

barges of this size (probably 60 ft x 20 ft [18m X 6m]) were commonly used by the CPR Lake & River Service for moving freight and ice breaking. For ice breaking, the barge would be tied to the front of a paddlewheeler and pushed ahead of the vessel. It would break the ice by being pushed through it or it would ride up on the ice to break it. The smaller barges were made of wood.

The video reveals that this barge is, indeed, made of wood. So, this sunken barge appears to be a remnant of an earlier age of steam-driven tugs and sternwheelers moving freight along the Lake.

Even more interesting is that, if it had been used for ice breaking, the barge speaks of a time before the dams of the Columbia River Treaty (1964) tamed the extremes of the high water of spring and the low water of winter.

Prior to the dams, the waters of the West Arm might freeze from one shore across to the opposite one. My mother spoke of the winter of 1934-35 when she (and others) were able to walk across the Lake at Nelson. Yet, at present, the most ice the Lake gets is a bit hugging the shore. The difference is not the result of global warming; the change predates any marked warming. The difference is the result of the dams. By replacing the older winter’s shallow and gentle flow with the present deeper and faster flow, surface ice has been inhibited.

This sunken barge recalls an earlier age on the Lake of steam technology and frozen waters.

Barely discernible at the centre of the picture is a rectangular barge on the floor of the Lake. I don’t know when it was built or when it sank, but it is clearly from a different era.

Posted in history | Comments Off on Sunken barge

March goulash

 

March closes with a handful of birds that just did not make the cut to have a posting of their own.

The first local sightings of the Eurasian Collared Dove were made in 2008 after they had spread across the continent from a 1970s introduction in the Bahamas. The bird is now fairly common around the Creston Flats.
 

The Dark-eyed Junco is quite common in the spring as many move north to breed. This one was singing.

How does one lose a flock of swans? These were flying along the West Arm, but I couldn’t find their destination.

Had I not seen a Red-tailed Hawk fly to this tree, I would have never spotted it in the foliage.
 

On March 30th, a Tree Swallow arrived at pilings it previously used for nesting, but there it found a flicker. Of a group of three cavities suitable for the swallow, two already held flickers and one is being explored by starlings. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Posted in birds | 4 Comments

Bluebirds and shrike

 

Yesterday I watched insectivores hunting in a field: Mountain Bluebirds and Northern Shrikes.

Two weeks ago, the treat was the Western Bluebird, which sports an orange breast and shoulders. The breast of the Mountain Bluebird is powder blue (male) or grey (female).

A male (left) Mountain Bluebird and female (right) watch for insects from a fence.

From such a perch each will swoop down and capture a bug.

Unexpected was a sight of Mountain Bluebirds and a Shrike on adjacent fence posts. While they all hunt insects, the shrike will also take small birds. Indeed, the bluebirds seem to be eyeing the shrike warily. 

I managed to get close enough to get a couple of portraits. First the (male) Mountain Bluebird,

then the Northern Shrike.
    

Posted in birds | Comments Off on Bluebirds and shrike

Disparate grazers

 

On adjacent days I watched two rather different mammals graze: marmot and elk. The two occupy different habitats and differ in weight by a factor of a hundred, but for each, grass is a staple of its diet.

A Yellow-bellied Marmot eats grass during the day along the edge of its home in a field of rocks.

An Elk eats grass during the evening in an open field.

Each deserves a portrait set in its favoured habitat. First the marmot,

then the elk.
  

Posted in mammals | 1 Comment

Pole dancer

 

While she gyrated, the male Mallard watched from the beach.

Posted in birds | 4 Comments

Shore-facing cavities

 

Yesterday, as I watched a flicker couple excavate yet-another cavity nest on the shore side of a piling, I speculated that there might be an interesting story to be told. 

Over the years I had casually been aware that the cavity nests that the Northern Flicker constructed in pilings around Kootenay Lake seemed to follow a pattern: They all seemed to face the shore. But, would my anecdotal observations hold up to the collection of a few more observations? And if they did, what might be motivating the flickers to do this?

Elsewhere, Northern Flickers build their nests in trees, and, as Karen Wiebe noted in a 2001 paper about the flickers at Riske Creek (southwest of Williams Lake, BC), flickers tend to orientate their cavities to the south—apparently to increase the incubation temperature. Yet, that pattern, seen in the Cariboo, did not seem to hold around here. 

This morning I did a casual survey of (some easily accessible) pilings around the West Arm of Kootenay Lake looking at shorelines oriented in various directions. Where the shoreline was west of the piling, the cavities faced west; when shoreline was north of the piling, the cavities faced north; when north east, they faced that way. It was the same for south and south east. There was no preferred compass direction, certainly none dictated by the Sun. The shoreline dictated orientation. 

At first, there appeared to be two puzzling exceptions to this pattern: pilings on either side of a narrows (a constriction in the Lake), and those adjacent to a floating drydock. In these cases, cavities appeared on each side of the pilings. Yet, these make sense. If the objective is to face the shore, then in a narrows, there is an ambiguity as to which shoreline is relevant. Some of the cavities on the pilings holding the drydock faced the shore, while others faced the dock. However, from the bird’s point of view, the dock was probably perceived as merely another shore.

Now comes the first speculation: The flicker’s concern is for a land predator. It is better to see one coming and be able to vacate than to have one attack from behind. (An aerial predator could come from any direction, so there is no preferred defence there.) 

A second speculation: When flicker chicks fledge, it is better to have them fly towards land than out over water.

But, why does the Kootenay Lake experience differ so much from that of Riske Creek. Possibly because on land, a predator can come from any side so optimization might as well be based merely upon incubation temperature, and a chick can fledge in any direction.

 Yesterday’s (female) Northern Flicker. She was building a nest on the north side—the shore side—of a piling.

This is a view of last year’s flicker couple checking out a shore-facing nest. In it, they later produced chicks.

The wooden pilings holding this floating drydock contain flicker cavities that face both the shore (to the lower right) and the dock. From the flicker’s point of view, the dock is probably just another shore.

Posted in birds | 4 Comments