Fish are a staple food for much of the wildlife around the Lake — we are, after all, dealing with a lake — so, I show wildlife feasting on fish.
This posting was prompted by recent pictures, but these images have been supplemented by shots drawn from earlier occasions. The reason for this is that some of the events are so fleeting that few have been recorded, and one can only show what one has.
There are about two dozen species of fish in the Lake. Rather than try to show all, I illustrate only the spectacular spawning Kokanee. Most spawning creeks are well shaded, but for a shot of the Kokanee in their dazzling redness, one must find a spot where they pass through sunlight.

The raven is an inveterate predator upon the spawning Kokanee.

During much of the warm season, ospreys specialize in suckers, but come the time of Kokanee spawning, preferences change. Notice the two wasps taking an interest in the Kokanee.

The Bald Eagle is a versatile eater, so during Kokanee spawning, it takes advantage of them.

The mallard is a flexible feeder that often poaches Kokanee eggs, but here it eats a carcass.

A perennial favourite of wildlife is the sucker. Here a Hooded Merganser downs one.

Most birds must swallow their meal whole, so the size of the prey changes with the size of the predator. This Belted Kingfisher is limited to rather small fish.

A Pied-billed Grebe can handle a modestly larger fish.

A Great Blue Heron can swallow a rather large one.

A gull can pick a fish apart, yet, this fish was swallowed whole as the bird flew.

The fish being consumed by this Common Merganser is unidentified.

A loon swallows a fish far out on the lake.

A lesser known fish is the Slimy Sculpin being consumed by this Horned Grebe.

One might imagine that fish are the preserve of birds. Not so, here a Black Bear eats a Kokanee.

And a River Otter eats a sucker.

I have failed to show a Turkey Vulture eating anything. That they hang around and feast on fish carcasses is clear, but I have yet to catch them in the act. It remains something to look for.

Perplexing sky
Down here on the surface of the earth, we are used to judging distance with the help of contrast: distant objects have a lower contrast than those in the foreground. This insight works for solid objects with sharp boundaries. So, with each successively distant ridge, the trees lose contrast as dark objects become lighter and bright objects become darker.
This is so much a part of our experience that we don’t give it any thought while using it to judge relative distance. It is illustrated with a picture taken through the smoky air of last summer’s fire season (right), but the behaviour is the same, only more gradual, in clear air.
The guideline that contrast decreases with distance can be problematic when dealing with clouds, which range from the opaque to the diaphanous. Consider this morning’s sunrise shot. (The yellowish cast results from the smoke of forest fires farther east, and while the colour adds to the drama, it is not the point of this discussion.)
Rather, look at the contrail on the right side of the picture. We percieve it as being in front of the higher cloud because of its higher contrast. Alas, our perception is wrong.
Consider the geometry of the scene. The sun is above the horizon and so must be shining down on all clouds. However, the contrail is casting a shadow on that supposed higher cloud. Ergo, despite perceptions, the contrail must be above (more distant than) the high cloud.
A contrail (right-hand side) looks as if it is lower than the high cloud, but it is actually higher.
