This posting is about the aerodynamic drag on a flying Great Blue Heron. So why open with pictures of the Sandhill Crane? Well, the two species are often confused. Further, they have different strategies for minimizing aerodynamic drag.
We see both species: the Sandhill Crane is a warm season visitor to the south end of the Main Lake; the Great Blue Heron is a permanent resident of all the Lake. And for good measure, I toss a swan into the discussion.
Now, I start with the flawed tradition of offering a digression on a digression (heron > crane > cranberry), I note that the cranberry is named after the crane; it is literally the crane berry. This close view of bare skin on the head of a Sandhill Crane suggests why.

Here are two Sandhill Cranes on the Creston Flats.

And here are two Great Blue Herons on the West Arm. At a casual glance, the one might be mistaken for the other, both being big birds with long necks and legs. However, cranes and herons even belong to different families.

This view of a heron, which has just taken to the air, illustrates the reason that long-necked birds need to address the problem of aerodynamic drag. The S-shaped neck sets up turbulence in the airflow across it, so increases the drag. Quickly it will adjust its neck.

The Sandhill Crane, with a somewhat less flexible neck, flies with it fully extended.

So do both of our swan species. This is a Trumpeter Swan.

The heron adopts a different solution to the problem of drag. In sustained flight, the heron tucks its head tightly against its back to provide a smooth flow of air across its head and back. One does wonder whether the crane or the heron adopted the better solution.






























There is an evolutionary process here which gradually increases the length of both the moth’s tongue and the nectar spur. The moths with the longest tongues are favoured as they can reach the bottom of the spur and so receive the most nutrients. The flowers with the longest spurs are favoured as their reproductive organs optimally press against the moth which then increases their reproduction. So, each slowly gets longer and longer.













Flying fish
Problem month: Unlike my usual ten or so postings a month, for the last thirty days, I made only one. The blog, itself, vanished, and even when it was restored, the subscriber emailer did not work. Add to this, interminable thick wildfire smoke blanketed the area making eyes burn and breathing difficult. (I fled to the Coast.) Further, local covid cases skyrocketed. It has been a difficult month. Sigh…, with this posting, the blog, mailings, and I seem restored.
More than any other bird, the Osprey is the symbol of Kootenay Lake. It is numerous and highly visible during the warm season as it fishes and nests over and adjacent to the waters. If you head out on the Lake in the summer, or even walk its shore, an inquisitive eye treats you the sight of an osprey hovering over the water, diving, lifting fish from the water, and flying off with it to feed its young.
This leads to a summer of flying fish, many of which are headless.
Ospreys and humans have had a long relationship, certainly since European settlers started driving pilings in the shallows, and possibly earlier. Ospreys like the easy access to the Lake that humans provide by building dolphins and erecting pilings. They find these human structures propitious for their nests. Mind you, while ospreys tolerate human presence, they chirp their objections if people happen to get too close to what they perceive as their nest-bearing structures. Oh well, they are fun to watch.
The relationship did not always go as well as it does now. When I was a child, my family was horrified when louts would set nest-bearing pilings afire so as to incinerate osprey chicks. (The pilings at Troup still bear the scars of those fires.) The motivation for this bit of vandalism was apparently the assumption of local fishermen that the ospreys were stealing all the good game fish, and these were fish the humans wanted for themselves.
Apart from the inherent injustice of this behaviour, it relied upon a faulty assessment of osprey activities. Osprey generally grab the easiest prey, and those tend to be the slowly swimming suckers. Suckers are not the good-eating fish that fishermen seek. However, the facts did not stop humans from demonizing osprey believing that they favoured trout and Kokanee. Sigh….
Here are two pictures of flying suckers taken this last week.
